Tuesday, February 28, 2006

Government Wisdom

It's all tightly regulated. Take, for instance, emergency power generation. I happen to work in a building with a 1 MegaWatt backup diesel power generator. This is a useful thing to have, as lots of stuff in said building doesn't like being shutdown, especially ungracefully. When I say lots of stuff, I mean, quite literally, billions of dollars worth of equipment. So it is fair to say the regulation stipulating emergency power is a wise one. Of course, we can't have a backup generator just sit there. It has to be tested to make sure it still works. This testing occurs exactly once every month, as dictated by regulation. Again, a wise decision. We wouldn't want to suddenly need the generator (which, by the way, is equipped to automatically engage in the event of a commercial power loss) and have it not work.

But I have saved the best wisdom for last. In their infinite wisdom, someone has decided that it is not merely sufficient to turn on the generator once a month to verify its operational status. Yea, verily, it must also be activated, and a very large single-pole single-throw (the same kind in Dr. Frankenstien's lab) switch must be thrown, to shift the entire energy load of the building onto the generator for a period of several hours.

Now, what do you think happens when a very large switch is thrown to shift from one power source to another? Correct! There is a correspondingly very large power glitch in the *entire* building. UPS's engage, beeping their astonishment at the audacity of the electrical current, but faithfully provide interim power to thier subjects. Unfortunately, not everything in the building has a UPS backup, especially those pieces of equipment with very large power requirements. Incidentally, these are the very same pieces of equipment which get very cranky when their power supply is interrupted. And by cranky I mean things break. Expensive things. So, given this apparently immutable regulation, how do we adapt to this situation once a month? Well, I'll tell you. Once a month we shutdown the expensive equipment that doesn't like to be shutdown because shutting it down our way is better than having large amounts of volts surge through it when a switch is thrown, twice in one day.

So, let's recap: to protect expensive, sensitive equipment we have a regulated emergency power generator that, by regulation, is tested once a month, and, also by regulation, is switched over to power the sensitive, expensive equipment, thus often damaging said equipment by the very regulations designed to protect it.

That, my friends, is government wisdom. Some say the finest there is. I am not one of them.

Thursday, February 23, 2006

Hey, is this a good deal?

Is this a good deal? I need some experts to tell me if this one is worth buying or not...

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=5668157701

Tuesday, February 21, 2006

Grolsch - Dutch for Budweiser

I've always thought Grolsch sucks. About once a year I forget that I think it sucks and try it again. Then I remember it sucks, but have a full beer. It sucks having a full sucky beer when you want good beer. It's one of the suckiest sucks that ever sucked.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,185585,00.html

Friday, February 17, 2006

A fairtax argument...

...I've been having over on another blog's comments. This is an otherwise reasonable person that seems particularly argumentative on this issue. Oh well...

http://cobranchi.com/?p=6098

Wednesday, February 15, 2006

Proof Cash is dying

Waffle House now accepts credit cards (Visa and MC). How screwed up is that? I found this out last weekend, but wrote it up as being a rougue Waffle House like the one I don't go to b/c they use a computer instead of the yellow pad (which is complete crap).

However, I saw an web ad today (ajc.com if you want to try to see it) saying that WH now takes cards. This is very distressing. However, it's further proof that cash is a dying dinosaur. In my opinion this is a bad thing.

Cash is very tangible, and you can't spend what you don't have. This is why it's so recommended for people who find themselves in credit card debt. Cards are just too easy to use, and discipline is required.

Besides that, as Tinfoil Hat will tell you, having all your transactions done electronically just gives the government more information when they start mining it. They don't need to know how often I go to Waffle House vs. IHOP.

There's no disputing that cards are very handy to have, and I use mine more than I should. I think I'm going to set a rule, that all purchases under $20 be handled with cash.

Monday, February 13, 2006

Netflix

I have to say I'm not really all that impressed with all the hullabaloo over Netflix and "throttling". In fact, I'm going to side with Netflix on this one. Especially when people make ignorant statements like:


"Netflix isn't well within its rights to throttle users," complained a customer identified as "annoyed" in a posting on the site. "They say unlimited rentals. They are liars."


Bullshit. Netflix, like every other business in the history of the world, exists to make money. If you as a customer - especially part of a small group out of millions of customers - are eroding profits by trying to take advantage of a marketing gimmick, then Netflix IS well within its rights to throttle you. Seriously. 18-22 movies a month? Get off the couch and do something useful with your life, instead of bitching and moaning while filing frivolous lawsuits. You are not an important customer to them. In fact, they will probably make more money if you cancel, since you won't be costing them $17.16 a month in postage to enable you from having any meaningful social interaction in your life.

Wankers. Now excuse me while I go dig up some conspiracy theories. Now *that's* something useful.

Wednesday, February 08, 2006

What's taking so long in there?

This is a risk I was not aware of on all those band trips...

Thursday, February 02, 2006

Sleepless Horror

This is what I see when I see trailers for chick flicks.

Ugh ugh ugh

House Republicans elect Boehner as leader - Yahoo! News

My comment on this story is not about the main topic, but instead a minor detail:
Boehner had 122 votes to Blunt's 109. Shadegg dropped out after a first ballot loss.
Freaking politicians with their freaking 2-party system. When they want a fair election they hold multiple ballots, or have a "ranked ballot" so they can vote for who they want to.

But when it's time for their own elections, they force "plurality wins". How many people voted for GWB in the last election only to make sure Kerry didn't win?

I think politicians really don't care all that much if you vote Republican or Democrat, as long as you vote Republican or Democrat. If only more people would understand this!

Squashing anger for now.... stupid politicians.